On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:59 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Dr. J Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:11 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hackers gained access to the password account to the site. This does >>> not mean they have your password, but a scrambled version of your >>> password, known as a hash. Unfortunately, malicious hackers could use >>> try to brute force the hash or use other techniques to find your >>> password, especially if is an easy to guess combination of letters and >>> numbers.
>> Is this an action of the n3td3v group in furtherance of the n3td3v agenda? > I hope Robert Lemos's site recovers as quickly as possible, and I > condemn any law breaking by ZF0. > > All the best, > > n3td3v > Mr. Wallace, my question was "Is this an action of the n3td3v group in furtherance of the n3td3v agenda?" Your answer was, "I condemn any law breaking by ZF0." You used a debating tactic of obfuscation called "Suppressed Evidence." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
