Edited for those of us who can read normal text better than leet speak. > First off, thanks for reporting the forwarding message > vulnerability in Google groups(*) to the Full Disclosure > mailing list. You are quite popular and well received on > this list, so I'm sure you have just earned the respect > and adulation of tens, nay, ones of people who wish they > were so lucky to be as talented at finding vulnerabilities > in Google groups as you. > > Most people will ask themselves, "How the fuck is this > an "obviously critical" security issue and why does this > guy who was born with a rather unfortunate physical > disposition keep spamming fd with senseless garbage that > does not adhere to the list charter?" > > The next question people will ask themselves is, "If this > kid hates security researchers and the security community > so much, why does this conglomeration of ugly-cells post > "critical security issues" to the same mailing list he > condemns other researchers on?" > > I must say, i've asked these same questions myself. But > I remind myself that the really important security > researchers such as yourself often only disclose the > unimportant "obviously critical" vulnerabilities here, > while reporting the "obviously super duper ultra mega > threatcon 2 holy-shit-the-whole-internet-will-be-owned" > issues to the vendor only, giving them ample time to patch > and coordinate public disclosure. > > Let this serve as a reminder to all the haters of the NDQ > that it's because of his pioneering method of evading bans > on Google groups (which is so stupid even he isn't sure how > to reproduce it) and his 4,000+ deep Google group of spambots, > intelligence officials, and daily jokemail subscribers that > we can all sleep a little better at night. >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
