rawket wrote: > There are voice encryption protocols already Fabio, you should get a > STU-III Phone then call the Whitehouse. > tell them to "go secure" lol. > mmm yes but respect STU-III (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STU-III) to talk to the Whitehouse would be better to use a SCIP compatible device (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCIP).
In both case the keys are owned but NSA, better than skype? :) Or we could use some terrorist-oriented technology like steganography with RTP! http://druid.caughq.org/presentations/Real-time-Steganography-with-RTP.pdf Even if at the end of the story zrtp (zfoneproject.com) it's the best choice cause Zimmermann have done a great work and he's a very hard crypto guys with political motivation! And be careful, do not trust the Cisco proposed DTLS-SRTP for voice encryption, it's a crap standard plenty of vulnerability and implementation complexity (http://zfoneproject.com/faq.html#ZRTP-vs-DTLS) . We should all sustain ZRTP as a standard for voice encryption, it's like the past fight between PGP-OpenPGP/MIME and X509- S/MIME ! Fabio/naif _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
