theyve been doing this 4 years. get in the now. On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:27 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:24 PM > Subject: Comment on: Microsoft to give partners heads-up on security > vulnerabilities > To: n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > by n3td3v August 5, 2008 8:17 AM > > Verbal contracts of non-disclosure agreements don't work, you need a > new law in place, which I call the responsible disclosure act, > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/0439.html to enforce the > agreement by a law if the agreement is broken. Or are you guys just > gonna do another "oops the cat's out the bag" again like what happened > with the verbal contract agreement Dan Kaminsky had with everyone > before a blog entry leaked the vulnerability by *accident*. Is this > Microsoft agreement of non-disclosure actually enforceable by any > current law? If not a new law is needed to be drawn up, see the link > above, or this "Microsoft Active Protection Program" is gonna turn out > a complete shambles. > > http://news.cnet.com/8601-1009_3-10006325.html?communityId=2114&targetCommunityId=2114&messageId=772539#772539 > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
