waaaaaaaaa. marc's penis is bigger than mine. i cant figure out youtube to upload my own video of a speech... waaaaaaaa... oh yeah, thats cause i am not invited to give speeches like marc.... waaaaaaaa... --n3td3v
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:33 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Stephen Johnson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] die >>> >>> >>>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what >>>> to >>>> do. >>>> >>> >>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to >>> do. >> >> Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this >> address in a way that will never complete >> > > As long as Marcus Sachs doesn't make cyber security a national > security agenda as the next administration is coming in. n3td3v saw > that as a real threat to other countries national security > specifically the United Kingdom, and as such I am on false flag alert. > I'm convinced Marcus Sachs is hungry for power in Washington to do > with cyber security. > > I think thats what was behind his senseless domain name reportage on > the Sans Dairy, he wanted to put cyber security infront of the next > administration as it is coming in. He thought Gustav was gonna be a > major cat 4, cat 5 hurricane and thought this is a perfect way to put > cyber security infront of the next next administration as they are > coming in. Unfortunately for him his postings of domain names just > turned into an alert board for the cyber criminals and helped them in > knowing which domains not to use in cyber attacks. Plus the hurricane > ended up making landfall on the Gulf Coast as a cat 2, cat 1 > hurricane, so made his attempts to artificially ramp up cyber security > as a national security agenda a damp squid. > > Although there is a flaw in his thinking, why make something a > national security agenda when it isn't one? And thats what worries me. > Why not let it naturally be a national security agenda or not be a > natural national security agenda, why do you need to ramp something up > to be a national security agenda when it isn't one? > > Cyber security isn't a national security agenda, but folks like Marcus > Sachs want it to be one, so he can gain control of "cyber" in > Washington. > > This is what i'm afraid of and Marcus Sachs and whoever he is related > to need to be watched closely, I seen that Youtube video as a real > threat and i'm keeping a close eye on him and any future dialog he > outputs into the security community and wider world. > > Gadi Evron is small fry in comparison to Marcus Sachs, although Gadi > is power hungry and could become a national security threat, he isn't > right now, the real concern is that of Marcus Sachs and the Cnet News > Youtube clip that mentions he or people he has obviously been having > discussions with behind the scenes are wanting to artificially ramp up > cyber security in timing with Obama or McCain getting into the White > House, either so Marcus Sachs or his associates can A) Grab front > focus power for the next four years, B) Get funding for various > "projects" they deem as important. > > When you've got big leaders talking about influencing the next > administration as they are coming in to a bunch of folks at Black Hat > 2008, it really sends alarm bells ringing, I just hope the guy is > being wiretapped. > > Sure, Gadi Evron is power hungry, but there are bigger fish to fry... > Marcus Sachs. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU > > We need to get the full video of the Youtube video link i've post > above put online, does Cnet News have the full video of the > presentation? If so post it onto Youtube. > > Also, if Blackhat.com have the full video of the presentation, please > post it online. > > Can everyone keep an eye on > https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-08/bh-usa-08-archive.html#Sachs > and email me when and if the video full appears there, we need to > track this guy and keep an eye on him. > > If I ever get into MI5, i'll be focusing all my efforts on Sachs, so I > hope the people who do work in MI5 keep an eye on Sachs in the run up > to the election and beyond. > > Gadi is only causing collateral damage right now, by him pumping out > about Estonia and Georgia being blamed on Russia and the news > journalists believing that, when really both of those incidents were > the work of the U.S government. > > The other governments can put up with Gadi's bot net claims and what > appears in the media because of him, because its not really his fault > unless the CIA have leaned on Mossad, to lean on Gadi Evron, to post > on the internet who is to blame for Estonia, Georgia and whatever else > Sachs and company may have planned to artificially ramp up cyber > security as a national security agenda as the next president is coming > in, (See Youtube video for Marcus Sachs quotes). > > All the best, > > n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
