On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, although any single hacking case probably isn't the > President's > job, unless it's a highly visible one like the McKinnon case, the question of > what policies/directives should be issued to deal with the general question > *is* the President's job. >
I'm talking about artificially ramping up something and giving a false impression to a president just so you can get power and money should be illegal. What Marcus Sachs said in the Youtube video sounds illegal. He wants to ramp up cyber security to make it something a president should worry about, even though in its natural state he knows it isn't one. Would that not come under some kind of fraud, to cheat and lie to a president to get money from him for something that doesn't actually need money for in its natural state. Why should we let Marcus Sachs get away with it, when the evidence is on Youtube. Why don't the security community show the next administration the Youtube video, and then Marcus Sachs would have no chance of getting anything, because they will realise he is just lying and cheating, and ramping up cyber security to be something that it isn't. All the best, n3td3v -- https://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
