k, i have a proposal. i go away, if n3td3v goes away. ill be watching. On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ureleet wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:45 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> There has been a lot of publicity about the Marcus Sachs Youtube video >>> that is a clip of his panel discussion at Black Hat 2008, "Commission >>> on Cyber Security for the 44th Presidency". >>> >> >> there has been alot of publicity... from YOU. no one else gives a shit. >> >> >>> Jeff, we need the full pdf, audio, video of what he said to put my >>> mind at rest, can you arrange it bro? >>> >> >> bro. like you know him. >> >> >>> There is a lot of speculation now about the Obama sex video spam, Cnet >>> News is even speculating about a false flag cyber attack to influence >>> the political process. >>> >>> "Is it the work of the Republicans?" Cnet News said. >>> >> >> ah yes, because u are in america? oh wait. u suck. >> >> >>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10038812-83.html >>> >>> n3td3v replied "Its the work of Marcus Sachs: >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU"; >>> >> >> he references himself. i believe that's called something? > I think it's called Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, alas - he's evidently > the sort that masturbates whilst looking at the mirror. > > You aren't much help, ureleet - but with a name like that, I don't think > it's very expected. > > You all need to begin to realize (if you choose to) that these lists > aren't watched only by so called like minded individuals. The > 'social-fibre' upon which these lists were built suggests freedom in > communicating, but not as a playground for morons or scenewhores, but as > a learning and sharing environment of methodologies that aren't familiar > to all, regardless of if they seem antiquated or weak. > > These current discussions go beyond the horizon of that which is called > pathetic. I'm not a firm believer or a supporter in 'full-disclosure' > but I've watched these lists and others, and find myself interested in > intelligent discussions; I regard Computer Security as a sport. I like > it, and I like tearing it down - With the sort of discussions here, it's > easy to assume that at least 40% of the readers could probably be > educated by #teenchat and #spam. Grow up. > > This is a post, centric to 'n3td3v' a talentless scenewhore with > experience only in things like metasploit, ethereal and milw0rm, but > claimed to be a security expert; whom of which probably can't even tell > us what SPARC stands for, fortunately he has a lot of experience in the > regal art of kaspersky antivirus plugin/module design techniques. If you > have a problem, n3td3v - blog about it. A unilateral response from you, > to this, would disgust me, that goes to everyone else on this list. We > don't want to hear from you, we want you to hear from us. Stop > attempting to work so hard to be children. It repels the fun for > everyone else who would like to participate in what these lists are > meant for. > > Thanks for assessing this, whatever side of the field you're on. > -- > > mach > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
