Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Now if the next 47 things they find are *also* in lame products that nobody > uses, then you'd have a point...
IMHO there's nothing wrong publishing tons of vulns in "lame products" (whatever that should mean), why shouldn't less important apps also become more secure? > (A quick google shows that Hanno recently scored a CVE against clamav, > which certainly isn't a lame unused package. Might want to reconsider that > "lame fuck" label...) And while the gallery team even payed me a bounty for a "lame issue", clamav didn't even bother to give me credits. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
