Legally, is there any precedence that private systems owned by the government are public domain? Furthermore, has there ever been any legal precedent that any private system, if left unsecured, is in the public domain?
Either way, I hark back to: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/brits-us-passed.html This whole thing has been blown way out of proportion...c'est tout On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:33 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dead right, you got your systems accessed by 'the public', because the > systems were 'public domain'. > > Your systems were public domain, get over yourselves and stop arguing about > it. > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Miller Grey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Wrong...dead wrong. > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:10 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:07 PM, offbitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:48 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The systems were 'public domain' because the door was open. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Proof or GTFO. > >> > > >> > >> No passwords were set = public domain. > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
