Val, guess they need to just change the name. A threat is what may happen. That's Tornato's and angry people. Perhaps changing the name to "PWN level" expresses it better. Who's been owned.
> > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:16:14 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Time to patch Windows boxes with > MS08-067 > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:29:33 BST, n3td3v said: > > as soon as you rate, threat level something, the bad guys have won... > > its time to rethink public rating and threat levels. > > No, the bad guys win if they manage to pwn or DoS one of my systems or > users. > Why do you think they win if we assign a threat level to something? > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 226 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20081024/d7b476da/attachment-0001.bin > > ------------------------------ > > > -- been great, thanks and yea I top post Big R
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
