You're like a shite that won't flush away. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > all speculation: > > no 1 knows 4 sure. > > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss > > http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ > > http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm > > c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article > w/out stealing ppls work. > > pay attention. > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> u arent getting it. >>> >>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual >>> backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can >>> acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has >>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any >>> system, patched or not. pay attention. >> >> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored >> here. The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms >> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files >> available through P2P to full remote system access. >> >> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other >> than this statement? >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
