Are you fucking retarded? The filtering of this information in any way would be a crime against humanity.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Bipin Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > This mailing list lives up to its name "Full Disclosure" for > tolerating the monkeys and their chattering in this list for quite > some time now without moderation or any action! This mailing list had > a "culture", "the audience base" and that was the "only reason" we all > subscribed to it! > > # Standard, culture, content quality, popular interest, intellect... > spam!, off topic discussion, unnecessary topic, flame war > > >From the above list ask anyone "sensible" enough to pick up qualities > to be a information security mailing list. What options do you come up > with? > If someone repeatedly meet to fail the general code of conduct please > band them for not being in "popular interest" for an unmoderated > discussion. Is it that hard so hard to grasp that those type of people > really dont deserve here? > > A wise person would never choose to speak in-between fools. It looks > like FD is starting to be plagued with similar trend and slowly > dropping on the quality of discussion/interest. > > If FD moderators cant maintain the mailing list culture, its quality > its market reputation and audience interest naturally decreases as it > has been. FD should be a platform to promote collective intelligence > in information security with MEANINGFUL full-disclosure instead of > having never ending noise, annoyance, distraction and meaning less > discussion to waste our time. FD was there because not all info-sec > mailing list provided unmoderated discussion. But moderators please > assure a minimum level of "content/quality". > > In the list we all are obligated to keep harmony with all but least > not with people with problem to socialize and generally annoyance. > Moderators are really not doing justice by going against the "popular > belief" (the subscribers) Please do not forget, the mailing list is > there because WE subscribers are there and we were subscribed to this > list because this mailing list had a culture! "Full-Disclosure" live > up to its name but please preserve a standard, a culture and a quality > of discussion. > > Phase 2: > - Post unnecessarily and very frequently like the current FD trend. > - Ask other 30 people to do the same. > - Make sure any/all meaningful discussion is dwarfed in unnecessary > and meaningless noise. > - Wait moderators to act... lobby........ or repeat phase 2 till FD > goes in dust, really! > > Shame on FD moderators for putting us on a situation to neither we can > unsubscribe from the list for the real content that pops here now and > then... but have to tolerate unproductive noise lots of time from > people with anonymous identities for top-posting on off-track > discussion. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- "If you see me laughing, you better have backups"
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
