ok this is what this whole thing looks like to me: To n3td3v: You often post ideas and express your opinion to this list. The some (often the more liberal) of us often disagree with you and others mock you for your adventurousness. Actually sometimes it looks childish, almost as if you're desperately trying to propose the big new thing that changes the world. The thing is your posting to a list where really, all that happens is people (mostly sec companies) post information on vulnerabilities in software and news in the sec field. You say you came here for information, then LEACH like the rest of us - just shut up. If you want a mailing list for proposed security project ideas then make one. You're enthusiastic and a dreamer who's obviously very forward and ambitious with that excellence. Just think before you talk, and maybe do something, like sit down and think: I want to be $A(as in what you're going to do with your LIFE!). To be that I need to get $B done. To do that I have to do $C[]/*<-that's a list(:s)*/.
To all that oppose n3td3v: Some of you (UreLeet + others) get a little too excited and flame. If you don't like how someone acts, what they have to say, who they are: then shut up! You don't need to bully something into submission just because you don't like it. If you get some angry rush feeling when you see a some stupid fat kid majorly embarrass himself by attempting to be funny with his freinds and just looking like that annoying retard kid the don't bully him! Be gentle and point out the problem (privately) (of course first think are you really of a knowledge and responsibility to instruct this child how to change his life) OR, much better: shut up, and go take your (own) anger out somewhere else, PC games do it for me, <www.thepcmanwebsite.com/media/pacman_flash/> - even that's good enough. btw n3td3v - I don't think you're a retarded fat child (ur not right?). Come to think about it: We're being listened to by a bunch of other people, mostly geeks who think FD is the shitz where all the l33t sec companies go for their patches and sec news (it isn't!). But are we all just doing this crap for the benefit of out audience. I mean I could have written these things to the individuals they where intended for. Hell I could have taken my own advice and shut up, blocked the troublesome email addresses, and carried on with my life (I'm a hobbiest). Are You All Just Doing This For The Benefit Of The Sec Gods We Wish We Where? THINK ABOUT IT Oh also I don't care about me - I'm a leach, I'll should probably not post on this list unless I have something decent to say too. On 12/9/08, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thats all he does is deflect, weve established that he never gives a > real answer. > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Elazar Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Brilliant use of deflection, keep it up, you might end up as some >> loser serial rapist on Law and Order, oh wait, they want actor's, >> not the real thing... >> >> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:55:08 -0500 n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said: >>>>>> We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making >>>infosec look >>>>>> bad, this isn't what infosec should be about. >>>>> >>>>> It's making one very small insignificant corner of infosec look >>>bad. >>>>> >>>>> Let's keep a sense of perspective, guys. >>>> >>>> Or, to look at it another way, it's tying up all the idiots in >>>one place and >>>> keeping the rest of infosec unsullied. :-) >>>> >>> >>>I agree, >>>But full-disclosure shouldn't be full of idiots so why do we let >>>it be >>>that way. It's because we reply to them that it happens. I was >>>gullible and naive to reply to them, i'm not replying to them >>>anymore. >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Charset: UTF8 >> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify >> Version: Hush 3.0 >> >> wpwEAQECAAYFAkk+qhEACgkQi04xwClgpZg3kQP9GEBAH9byz3/fJKvWHN9IFX0ycf17 >> 0LS0fUg/5BRHXck+a2uEZsNujlKoMYyl1XshW+HWH0rwmDTw/1S88vCqULiqiMI7yXD0 >> G01L1MDkA+dM9ntF0IHSPUz3r2a4qVfP4D8o6KB45oDizZOLiCB5zGQdV5g1hwlHEBsL >> KMecN/o= >> =dDzW >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> -- >> Click for free info on getting an MBA, $200K/ year potential. >> >> http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/PnY6qxsZwUO4JCrKLyAXmX1gJtIyy84Kr2W2NrYeIgv5LuxCIhDBW/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- I'm your best best friend. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
