i agree! On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I'm not interested in getting into flaming or some personal argument, but how > do you actually know this? > > I'm sure we all have ideas about how advanced the various security agencies > are, but that is conjecture not factual statement. > > Cheers > > K > > Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device > > -----Original Message----- > From: n3td3v <[email protected]> > > Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:22:13 > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > n3td3v<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft issues out-of-band patch > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nick FitzGerald > <[email protected]> wrote: >> n3td3v wrote: >> >> <<snip>> >>> What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that >>> only they know about and their technicians have developed their own >>> in-house patches for them. >>> >>> If that isn't impressive I don't know what is. >> >> Didn't you rail against the ZERT efforts when 0-days were being widely >> used in the wild and MS was doing "nothing much" abou them? >> >> Oh, sorry, I forgot which publicity whore I was talking to... >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Nick FitzGerald >> > > Yes, i'm against *publicly available* third party patches of any kind > and always have been. > > Best wishes, > > Andrew > > http://twitter.com/n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
