On Mon, January 5, 2009 19:01, James Matthews wrote: > SSL certs cost money. This one works the same. etc.. >
Well whilst I agree the self generated ones or whatever work well, I find it amusing that a _security_ based list is using one, and then expects people in the security industry to blindly accept or add exceptions for it - my irony alarm is going overtime at that one. I certainly wouldn't add an exception, as it's not a trusted website to me. I'm sure others would see it the same. Doesn't matter now, as I'm unsubbed via the mail method, because FD just has too much noise-signal these days. -- / Gary Wilson, aka dragon/dragonlord/dragonv480 \ .'(_.------. e: [email protected] MSN: dragonv480 .------._)`. < _ | FB: http://profile.to/gary_wilson_horse_dentist/ | _ > `.( `------' w: http://volvo480.northernscum.org.uk `------' ).' \ w: http://www.northernscum.org.uk / _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
