There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up and closed the gap on who you actually are.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet <[email protected]> wrote: > o, and dont forget darkmyst. > > u liar. > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew. i did. >>> and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me. further >>> echoing the sentiment that i share. >>> >> >> Your nicknames >> >>> andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker.. >>> >>> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or >>> spam, but 4 those of u that dont. >>> >>> heres my request: >>> >>> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in >>> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least >>> 20-30 others have done so as well. >>> >> >> Your nicknames >> >>> i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5. good luck. btw >>> -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend >>> 2 do a little research. 1 of those steps is to google ur name. >>> >>> andrew wallace >>> >> >> They know me already >> >>> and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v. and >>> u then will not have a job. u will fail. >>> >> >> Unlikely if I have intelligence they want >> >>> i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list. >>> again. ...again... but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if >>> not already. >>> >> >> Still here >> >>> i ask that u all ignore him. no 1 respond 2 him. i wont, j-f, i hope >>> u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont. every1, i implore u 2 please >>> ignore him. especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have >>> 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that >>> means we accept it. which is wrong. >>> >> >> Take your own advice >> >>> andrew i leave u w/ this thought: >>> >>> i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list. not every1, (as u >>> undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread), >>> and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name >>> is. we dont like u. we think u have no value. we think that the >>> best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave. we do not value ur >>> opinion. in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much >>> doesnt value any1s opinion! thats it. >>> >> >> Your nicknames >> >> Mine have only ever been: >> >> n3td3v >> xploitable >> hackthegov >> worriedsecurity >> >>> u want 2 b legit? try learning, and not regurgitating. u post >>> nothing of value. we read the same stuff u do. and those of us that >>> havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because >>> they r falling woefully behind. >>> >> >> More garbage >> >>> c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me. see u in 3-5 days if u dont. >>> >> >> Hope not >> > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
