http://uninformed.org/?v=4&a=5&t=sumry
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jubei Trippataka <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> >> I'll clarify for everyone since you seem lost. >> EVERYONE, THE NULL POINTER DOES NOT GET DEREFERENCED. It only >> gets referenced. And Jubei isn't even sure a null pointer is involved >> at all =) >> >> With that out of the way, I'd just like to say that I only meant to >> encourage people to check out an excellent paper. I didn't mean to say >> anything related to your argument other than to say that that >> paper is a must-read. If you can't appreciate that, why the fuck are you >> on F-D? Think about it. >> >> >> > I'm didn't even comment on Mark's paper, it is definitely a great piece of > research, there is no doubt. It's just that some people have read this paper > and thought, wow, all those NULL bugs are now exploitable. It's important to > separate these bug classes. > > I'd even go to say that while this paper is a must-read, please also spend > some time understanding it, otherwise don't bother. > > -- > ciao > > JT > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
