> > > > What have you ever written? Let us see some of your code to poke fun > of. If it is as imperfect as you then we'd have a day of fun.
If i would release something it will be planified, and inovative, i dont submit shit for fun or fake fame > > > >What's hilarious is that none of them are usefull :) > > http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1531 > http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1835 90% of the research above were found by fuzzing, and those are public. > Clearly my fuzzers are useful. > Wrong. The IE overhyped bug wasn't found with any of your fuzzers, and also do you really need a fuzzer to find a bug in konqueror ? The rest of theses lists are once again useless bugs, because these software are used by ~1000 users worldwide. Let me clarify this: i don't say you cant crash some useless cnet/download/.com software with your fuzzer, i only say that you cant beat any widly used software with your fuzzing methods. If you really knew what mean "Intelligent Fuzzing", we wouldn't have this discution right now.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
