You guys on twitter? lemme know what your @ is... im @journik it'll be wayyyy easier.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Matt<[email protected]> wrote: > Not to incite the riot that always follows this type of comment, but this > attach does not match 0-day requirements. It is only for older versions, > meaning that if you patched your OpenSSH two or three months ago when they > released the patches for a security issue that was not yet in the wild then > you would not have an issue with this supposed 0-day. It is only a 0-day if > you failed to follow patching procedures or were not paying attention to the > original patch several months ago. > > Please oh trollers, troll away. But can we please move on to real topics. > You guys are making me miss NetDEV and his useless conversations on this > list. > > > > > Sent to you by Matt via Google Reader: > > > > > Re: [Rumor] SSH 0-day > > via Full Disclosure (fulldisclosure) Mailing List on 7/9/09 > Posted by James Matthews on Jul 9 > > I am worried that if it is an OpenSSH 0day how much damage should I expect. > However SANS doesn't seem to think it's real. > > James > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Kaspar Mendev <kaspar.m_at_gmx.com> wrote: > >> See also their update http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6760 >> > ... > > > > > Things you can do from here: > > Subscribe to Full Disclosure (fulldisclosure) Mailing List using Google > Reader > Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite > sites > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Provider http://journik.com http://journik.posterous.com http://twitter.com/journik _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
