/me sheepishly acquiesces to Dan publically. Dan is right, I am wrong. After consulting our resident grammar expert, I have been corrected. My apologies to Dan for incorrectly attributing a grammatical error to his piece. I was going to bet on it too ;)
t -----Original Message----- From: Dan Goodin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:21 PM To: Thor (Hammer of God) Subject: Re: Brilliant attack "bypasses" bitlocker "Methods" is an object in the sentence. I think what's confusing you is that it comes ahead of the subject, which is "attack." Thor (Hammer of God) wrote: > Sorry, you're wrong on this one. Only if your structure was "The > hardware-level phishing attack" as the object and not "methods" would you be > correct. But it's not.... The methods "are," not the methods "is." You > might have intended that to be the case, but you didn't write it like that. > > t _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
