This discussion is getting weirder and weirder. If an examiner finds evidence on YOUR computer / cell phone / usb disks / whatever, please do tell me how it's not necessarily yours? By claiming your computer has been hacked? You do know an examiner usually knows how to double-check your story for malicious code right? Or what are you guys talking about?
My experience is that when I find the evidence, the person/s being investigated confesses quite rapidly. Cheers! On 1/26/10 4:31 AM, "Bipin Gautam" <[email protected]> wrote: > So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from > day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT > NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........? > oops................. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
