You checked this code on a 64-bit computer? I just tested it on Ubuntu 9.10 amd-64 edition (running from a LiveCD, no less). The result was the same as the one described above - Firefox chugged for a few seconds and then displayed a very wide web page.
-- Rohit Patnaik On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:15 AM, information security < [email protected]> wrote: > i had check this code in 64 bit computer it works > but why this code only work for Mozilla browser not in Internet Explorer > and > also thanks Jeff for all your comment :) > In India a famous Poet kabir says "keep your critic next to you he is your > best friend!" :) > > Asheesh kumar Mani Tripathi > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Jeff Williams <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sure; >> >> Mozilla by default recover any "lost" tabs by itself, then no worry for >> your "users" considerations. >> >> Now sparky, who will be stupid enough to launch a botnet that sets a web >> page containing a document.write "A" * 2000000000000000000 on them >> compromised hosts ? >> >> You tell me. >> >> >> >> 2010/3/3 information security <[email protected]> >> >>> Thanks Valdis .Jeff for all your comment >>> yes my small-penis machine running out of RAM and swap space ...: ...... >>> :)and i believe that Mozilla get crash ...........:( >>> can you tell me how to fix that people don't become victim from this >>> attack people with having 34 bit Computer >>> or people having small -penis machine change into big-penis machine :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:02:37 PST, information security said: >>>> >>>> > open in Mozilla Firefox and wait for 15 sec ...... :) and say Good Bye >>>> >>>> Sorry, your exploit doesn't do squat on a 64-bit Firefox 3.7a3 with >>>> plenty of >>>> RAM. It chugs for about 7-8 seconds and displays a *very* wide page. It >>>> must >>>> be your small-penis machine running out of RAM and swap space. :) >>>> >>>> Hint - this issue was well understood back in 1964. Literally. IBM's >>>> OS/360 had >>>> a GETMAIN macro that allocated storage that could encounter this same >>>> basic >>>> "out of memory" issue. So not only is this a non-bug that was known >>>> when you >>>> were still being toilet-trained, this may be the first recorded case of >>>> somebody reporting a non-bug that was known when their *parents* were >>>> still >>>> being toilet-trained. >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
