Lately, it seems that the old has become new :) D
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Nick FitzGerald <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan Kaminsky wrote: > >> I really like the hash length declaration bugs, where the client can >> tell the server how many bytes of a hash need to be validated. (Yep, >> you just say "one byte is plenty") >> >> SNMPv3 and XML-DSIG both fell to this, catastrophically. > > I thought Georgi asked for the newest class of elite vulns? > > Does (at least) ten years old count as new? > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-072.mspx > > And against Win9x count as elite? 8-) > > FWIW, MS00-072 was fairly widely exploited in the wild by at least the > Opaserv (aka Opasoft) family of worms, though not until a couple (?) of > years after the bulletin's release. > > > > Regards, > > Nick FitzGerald > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
