> > I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than > what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all). >
I know this is the Internet but you don't need to be quite so rude. Perhaps I just haven't been arrested (caught) as many times as you have. If you read > the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the > motive was. > I have not seen these IRC logs. Have you? Could you provide a reference for them please? JRoger On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ed Carp <[email protected]> wrote: > I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than > what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all). If you read > the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the > motive was. Your "release it to the public and you have no liability" > argument will land you in prison if you try it - go to any attorney > and ask. Your emotional "prove Stephen is a saint" attempt at > twisting what happens in the legal system doesn't change the FACT that > the burden of proof was easily met by the prosecution and that the > defense's arguments, while designed to sway people more used to > emotional appeals than logic, did little to impress the court, with > very predictable results. >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
