You're killin me over here ;) And while funny, you actually do raise a good point - I should not use the term "totally secure" like that. Rather, I should say that the encryption mechanisms used are based on industry standards and accepted mechanisms for strong encryption: RSA2048 asymmetric, AES256 symmetric, and SHA256.
I should have a full work up by the end of the weekend. t >-----Original Message----- >From: musnt live [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 9:09 AM >To: Thor (Hammer of God) >Cc: Benji; Larry Seltzer; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] My private key > >On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Thor (Hammer of God) ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's totally portable, totally secure, > >Hello Full Disclosure, I'd like to warn you about "totally secure" and rubber >hose cryptography. While Thor's bold statement of totally secure is so to say >potential and possible the interrogators at Camp X-Ray beg to differ. Yes list >"creative questioning" can yield Thor or anyone else's key and can be >mathematically proving using a patended Craig S. Wright algorithm: > >Let P(n) be the statement that says that key+password+...+n = (n/2)(n+1) > >Firstly P(n) has to be checked for n=N, which is impossible > >It cannot be shown that the truth of P(k-1) implies the truth of P(k). >Because, P(k-1) is the statement key+password+...+(k-1) = ((k-1)/2)k, which is >assumed to be true for k greater than or equal to 2 however N cannot be >calculated. > >Next add k to both sides of statement P(k-1) to get >key+password+...+(k-1)+k = ((k-1)/2)k+k. Taking out a factor of k on >the right hand side of the equation leaves key+password+...+k = (((k- >1)/2)+1)k = k((k/2) + (1/2)) =(k/2)(k+1), which implies that P(k) is true. >Condition 2 has been satisfied. > >Both conditions of the statement for the principle of mathematical induction >have been satisfied but N is never established and the proof is inconclusive, >in >other words P(n) is true for all positive integers n and nothing more given >that: B(eer)||T(orture)||M(oney) trump all >so: > >B+M=P(*) || T=P(*) > >Please contact Mr. Wright LLC, PhD, DDS, CISSP, GSE, GSE, GSE for future risk >metrics. Did forget I mention GSE? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
