On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > There was no hack? ATT didn't have 144K user's info pilfered?
that is yet to be decided in the judiciary and/or a jury of peers. AT&T's data spill due to their own negligence seems obvious, the rest of the culpability is yet to be assigned.... for a similar argument see Google's wifi snarfing mea culpa while still proclaiming adherence to 18 U.S.C. §2511(2)(g)(1), 18 U.S.C. §2510(16), etc.; and considering public good intent of the obfuscated release, rather than fraud per 18 U.S.C. §1029(a)(8) for example, the cause is weak. however, the realities for wee vs particular situation, across the federal, state, municipal and/or city jurisdictions is pretty poor. they're going to screw you on almost anything for almost any time period costing you almost any exorbitant defense if you've sufficiently pissed off the right resources. James Atkinson is currently getting screwed for over the counter proton pump inhibitors in unlabeled bottles among other trumped up state charges* ultimately driven by blow back for his whistle blowing and coast guard incompetence exposure before congress. * details too numerous to list here, but this is the abridged digest summary of the situation. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
