Paul has a point Cal - one should note that a full 53% of the posts on this 
topic (including this one) are in response to your posts about how this isn't 
the proper list for such posts in the first place.  That means the majority of 
the posts that you call inappropriate were actually created by you.  Filtering 
(or simply ignoring) original posts would have gone much further to perpetuate 
your goal of less off-topic chatter. 

t

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:full-disclosure-
>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:54 AM
>To: Paul Schmehl; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
>
>  *sighs*
>
>On 07/10/2010 19:53, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> Then you will be whining for a long time.
>>
>> I was the second person to subscribe to this list, and I can guarantee
>> you that no amount of whining will change it.  The bozos who post crap
>> will continue to post crap.  The folks who don't understand what
>> *un*-moderated list means will continue to complain about the bozos
>> posting crap.  And the sun will still come up in the morning.  And the
>> list will still go out every day. Ad infinitum ad nauseum.
>>
>> Either learn to use filters, stop complaining or unsubscribe.  Those
>> are your options.  Pick one.
>>
>> --On Thursday, October 07, 2010 15:16:54 +0100 "Cal Leeming
>> [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I will when people stop gossiping in the wrong list :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Benji <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Quit whining
>>>
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Sender: [email protected]
>>> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:05:18
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
>>>
>>>   I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
>>> Maybe there should be a new list for this kind of gossip whoring?
>>> [gossip-disclosure] maybe... *shrugs*
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2010 13:53, PsychoBilly wrote:
>>>> False assertion, it's an attention whoring story for anyone in
>>>> #sec..or in RPG
>>>>
>>>> 1- Fetch sparce elements
>>>>       wget:
>>>>       http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/10/cryptome-hacked/
>>>>       https://eta.securesslhost.net/~pgpboar/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129
>>>>       http://cryptome.org/0002/cryptome-hack3.htm
>>>>
>>>> 2- Make your own salad ( who's chasing who ).
>>>>
>>>>       CRYPTOME<  Wikileaks Insiders>  WIKILEAKS (
>>>> [email protected] )
>>>>       Wikileaks Insiders<>  pgpBoard ( the opponents ?[.gov]? )
>>>>       J.A.<>  Wikileaks ( the .gov.target )
>>>>       WIRED.COM<  Ruxpin>  Kim Zetter ( fear, Insiderzzzzz! +
>>>> panic.nicetry )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ************************
>>>>>     I'm not sure why everyone is so fussed about this tbh..
>>>>>
>>>>> And surely, full-disclosure is no place for such a discussion either..
>>>>>
>>>>> </rant>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/10/2010 19:06, Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
>>>>>> It's the newest tweet still.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juha-Matti
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeffrey Walton [[email protected]] kirjoitti:
>>>>>>> The latest is kind of funny ("Latest smear attempt: Chinese spy
>>>>>>> agency gave WikiLeaks $20M").
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just call it a 'PAC Contribution' and everything will be fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Juha-Matti Laurio
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>>>>>> And nothing related is not tweeted at
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/wikileaks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Juha-Matti
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Harry Behrens [[email protected]] kirjoitti:
>>>>>>>>>      for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have an idea what is happening here - it does
>>>>>>>>> smell slightly fishy...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         -h
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to