On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Christian Sciberras <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not all attackers are created > > equally. > > I still see this a simple matter of violating KISS to introduce a layer of > encryption. > The question is, to which end? Sure, an attacker might see the encrypted > file and think it's "too difficult" for him to get to the passwords. Another > might use a certain utility to decrypt the said file. The thing is, to which > end are > we encrypting the data? Just for the sake of making it work like the N other > programs? > I mean, if this doesn't *work*, why even *bother*?
Sorry, but your comments are totally useless here and can't even really be addressed properly, given their quite ridiculous nature. You are missing the point of the encryption, and it is not my job to convince you, and any further comments with anyone other than the developer are useless. > > There is no question here. There is no discussion. It should be done, > > and if it is not, password saving should be stopped in FileZilla or an > > alternative program should be sought. It's that simple. > > Great. If it's so simple that it can be done in under 10 mins, go complain > to them. This email thread *is* a direct complaint to them, after bugs have been closed for years. I didn't start this thread. Do you even understand what is going on here? Your emails suggest you do not. > Cheers, > Chris. -- silky http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
