Hey all, I think it's Oracle bad. I reported to Oracle this issue back on april 20th and probably Oracle when Roberto reported the same stuff on August just said "Thank you" and nothing more to Roberto.
Also Oracle seems to do mass credit so everyone can think that anyone found anything among the 29 advisories :D http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2010-176258.html Anyway, I'll post the advisory today clarification :) Cheers Stefano Il giorno mer, 20/10/2010 alle 08.58 -0700, Michal Zalewski ha scritto: > > Security-Assessment.com follows responsible disclosure > > and promptly contacted Oracle after discovering > > the issue. Oracle was contacted on August 1, > > 2010. > > My understanding is that Stefano Di Paola of Minded Security reported > this back in April; and further, the feature was a part of reasonably > well-documented functionality of Java pretty much ever since: > > http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/URL.html > > "Two hosts are considered equivalent if both host names can be > resolved into the same IP addresses" > > This was a pretty horrible design, so it's good to see it gone, though. > > /mz > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
