> Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 à 21:47 +0200, [email protected] a > écrit : >> Where is for example FORM auto-detection for those >> other tools? Where is SOCKS4 proxy support? Where is proxy >> randomization? >> Where is logic to drop dead proxies? Where is logic for >> fake-detection? > > Then, you should have started by that, it is that simple. > We are all busy and you can't expect anyone to even have a look on your > tool or link if you don't highlight how different it is from others or > why you did it. > > As far as I am concerned, these features may be nice, but I don't need > them and will stick to Medusa for the brute force tests I run from time > to time (ie not often, a few times a year at most). > But, to make it clear, it is just my personal opinion, I am not saying > that your tool is not interesting or useless. > >
If you read the first post i did regarding NiX: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Nov/115 It is listing the features. I can understand everyone is busy as i am as well. If you take a look at similar windows tools, none of those have an SSL support and pretty much them all are unreliable, that´s why i wanted to come up with more powerful solution. I am not saysing Hydras´s etc. are bad tools, I usually can make custom features regardless of a tool made. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
