Hi Fabio and others Full-Disclosure readers, Have you seen how WikiLeaks are editing already released cables?
Seems like WikiLeaks do not believe in Full-Disclosure and WL "partners" has already created "Ministry of Truth" (from Orwell's final novel 1984). For example in http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2008/07/08OTTAWA918.html on Dec 14 20:58 GMT entire paragraph about law been an "distraction" for law enforcement bodies was deleted: WAS (starting from Nov 30 07:18 GMT) "¶3. (S/NF) Responding to Dr. Cohen's query, Judd said CSIS had responded to recent, non-specific intelligence on possible terror operations by "vigorously harassing" known Hezbollah members in Canada. According to Judd, CSIS' current assessment is that no attack is "in the offing" in Canada. He noted, however, that Hezbollah members, and their lawyers, were considering new avenues of litigation resulting from recent court rulings that, Judd complained, had inappropriately treated intelligence agencies like law enforcement bodies (refs A and C). The Director observed that CSIS was "sinking deeper and deeper into judicial processes," making Legal Affairs the fastest growing division of his organization. Indeed, he added, legal challenges were becoming a "distraction" that could have a major "chill effect" on intelligence officials." NOW (starting from ~Dec 14 20:58 GMT): "¶3. (S/NF) XXXXXXXXXXXX" Source: Cablegate-Diff-201012142058 from http://www.privetbank.com.ua/cablegate/index.html Wikileaks hiding names is acceptable, but why legit content of USG cable is edited and deleted? Newspeak? Who can be hurt or killed because of this paragraph? If citizens in a democracy want their governments to reflect their wishes, they should ask to see what’s going on during WikiLeaks publishing/editing. -- Andriy G. Tereshchenko Odessa, Ukraine On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@infosecurity.ch> wrote: > > Hi all, > > i've been writing during past week a concept of leak management system with > the following main differences with wikileaks: > > Concentrate on leak amplification to let leaks reach media > No editing or publishing > Fully distributed organizations > Use best of existing anonymous networks (TOR/FreeNET) > > It has been named "openleak" (without the "s") but maybe it would be better > to change the name due to the misconfusion of "openleak.org" with > "openleaks.org" (the one in progress from daniel berg, ex-wikileaks). > > The OpenLeakProject.pdf with methodology analysis can be downloaded from > https://uloadr.com/u/91.pdf . > > Maybe nothing will be done, maybe something will be done, who know.... i just > want to share my idea with the nerdish hackish security community. > > That concept would require to be reviewed, to be put on the web ed eventually > start a community to discuss it and build-it ? > > Who know? > > Anyone willing to participate to a project like this contact me, maybe we can > arrange something? > > Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) > blog http://infosecurity.ch _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
