On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, stormrider <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > this sounds like a nice idea. Especially the fact that you kinda > "overmount" one filesystem over another to access hidden data. > But - as far as I know there is actually no steganography technique that > can really *hide* the data. So you will not be able to prevent someone > from finding out that there is some information inside the images. You > might want to read > > Attacks on Steganographic Systems. Andreas Pfitzmann: > Information Hiding. Third International Workshop, IH'99, Dresden, Germany
my favorite steganographic file system design used bits in inodes for storage. the benefit of this more stealthy mechanism is offset by the vastly expanded storage requirements. you need a *lot* of files to have enough inodes in play to be useful. this would not be vulnerable to the trivial unmasking that image based storage or other similar approaches take (like mentioned in the paper above) although it is unclear exactly how sparse and subtle the inode modification must be across a large, populated file system to be effective. alas, i remember hearing about this from a certain fellow at DC13 and never heard more... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
