Oh, I didn't realise that's what FreeNet did, I thought it was a tor alternative!
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 GMT, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" > said: > > If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and > hosted > > on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would > > be eligible for take down? > > Questions like that are part of why FreeNet and similar systems were > designed. > Nobody wants to be the test case for a simple question like that one, > because > even if you win the test case, it still sucks. So the obvious thing to do > is > fix things so the simple questions aren't an issue anymore, with the hope > that > the hard questions remain un-askable. > > When even the person who stored the file can't tell where the file is, and > the admin of each participating server has no way of telling what got > stored > on their node, it becomes really hard to draft a proper legal notice > (either > a 17 USC 512 takedown notice, or subpoenas/warrants for more serious > stuff). > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
