Interesting...! Does that mean that there is a 100 percent risk of the same tsunami over 500 years? Is there a cycle? When was the last one? Risk would be a lot higher than 10 percent if it was, say, 300 years since the last tsunami....
Haven't dug at all into it, this is just a very spontaneous thought... Georgi Guninski skrev 2011-03-30 12:50: > <quote> > The research paper concluded that there was a roughly 10 percent chance that > a tsunami could test or overrun the defenses of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear > power plant within a 50-year span based on the most conservative assumptions. > But Tokyo Electric did nothing to change its safety planning based on that > study, which was presented at a nuclear engineering conference in Miami in > July 2007. > [1] > </quote> > > on top of it their measuring devices overflowed: > > <quote> > Those levels may be higher still, but authorities say 1,000 millisieverts is > the upper limit of their measuring devices. [2] > </quote> > > [1] > http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/29/us-japa-nuclear-risks-idUSTRE72S2UA20110329 > [2] > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471904576229854179642220.html# > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
