He's looking to deny an encripted or signed message?? Gary B
On 04/30/2011 02:51 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:58:19 +0530, satyam pujari said: >> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=-----BEGIN+PGP+PRIVATE+KEY+BLOCK-----#q=BEGIN+PGP+PRIVATE+KEY+BLOCK+filetype%3Aasc&hl=en > 118 hits I see. Most of whom probably Didn't Get The Memo. > > However, for bonus points, can you think of a plausible scenario(*) where > posting > the private key actually makes sense? (Hint - what are the crypto > implications > of doing this as opposed to posting a revocation cert?) > > (*) Besides the obvious "proof I pwned the owner of this key, hard" - I mean > cases where the legit owner intentionally does it for a reason. > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
