http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/facebook-spy.pdf http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/facebook-spy2.pdf http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/google-spy.pdf
http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/online-spying.htm On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Clemens <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ivan . wrote: > >> it's the law, specifically CALEA >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act > > This is a bit different contextually than the statement made concerning > facebook etc. > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Javier Bassi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Clemens >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Prove it! >>>> You clearly know nothing about our legal system. >>> >>> You might find this links interesting >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0aQojDGSD4 >>> http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/ >> > > My point is LEO still has to apply for a title 3 wiretap or a subpoena which > is easier since 9/11 but its not as close to the statement that was made. > > "Google, Yahoo – all these major US organizations have built-in interfaces >> >> for US intelligence. It’s not a matter of serving a subpoena. They have an >> interface that they have developed for US intelligence to use." > > It really still is a matter of a subpoena, and that is my point. > > | Daniel Uriah Clemens > | Packetninjas L.L.C | | http://www.packetninjas.net > | c. 205.567.6850 | | o. 866.267.8851 > "Moments of sorrow are moments of sobriety" > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
