Forgive me for being dense but, what does "non-Amish exceptions" means??
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Michael Simpson <[email protected]>wrote: > On 4 May 2011 04:59, phil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don’t agree, google is by far the biggest database of what user want > and > > look for. If you merge those database (google) and facebook that must > make > > some leet profiling. (especially when you think that you can easily find > > where someone live with phone directory and you can match the ip by > sector > > too to match the google database) > > > > "some leet profiling" > if you look at what netflix (supposedly anonymised) + imdb was able to > do, or the classic of AOL releasing their searches (again anonymised) > then a join of google with facebook is quite a scary prospect. > Especially as d of b + partial zip/postcode allows for > re-identification most of the time (i believe that d of b + state = > 85% re-identification). > It wouldn't just be a selective subset but pretty much who, where, > when and probably why without too many non-Amish exceptions. > > mike > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
