I'll call you on that. Set it up, send it out, and show us how many people IRL you can actually get this to be exploited on. Your assumptions that the "majority" will fall because of "inherent casualness" has no basis whatsoever, and it just more blah-blah-windows-blah-blah crap from the Windows 95 days.
Seriously. Put your money where your mouth is. t From: yati sagade [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:57 AM To: Mitja Kolsek Cc: Thor (Hammer of God); [email protected]; [email protected]; Dan Kaminsky Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary Planting ProofOfConcept Hi, Nice revelations here. what we need to understand here is that the majority of Windows users there *will* fall for the remote exploit because of their inherent casualness(some actually think that 7 is the nicest OS ever made). I appreciate the efforts taken in finding these exploits, especially on such a closed, undocumented system. Additionally , thanks for those amusing tricks with special folders. keep up the good job. regards, yati On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Mitja Kolsek <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thor, the "Online Proof of Concept" section of the blog post points you to a *remote* exploit (without any warning) but let me repeat the link here: http://www.binaryplanting.com/demo/XP_2-click/test.html Visit this with IE8 on 32-bit Windows XP. Please find further information here: http://blog.acrossecurity.com/2011/05/anatomy-of-com-server-based-binary.html http://blog.acrossecurity.com/2011/05/silently-pwning-protected-mode-ie9-and.html In general there are two types of remote binary planting exploits: SMB and WebDAV. The former works inside (local) networks where firewalls block outbound SMB traffic. WebDAV attacks work through firewalls too since many firewalls allow outbound WebDAV traffic and Windows silently fall back to WebDAV if SMB doesn't work. If our online remote exploit doesn't work for you, you can download the PoC locally and test it in your local network. I'll be happy to explain it to you further if need be. Thanks, Mitja > -----Original Message----- > From: Thor (Hammer of God) > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:00 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 'Dan > Kaminsky' > Cc: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary > Planting ProofOfConcept > > But it *is* worth mentioning that you have to create the > malicious dll file, copy it to the system, create folders > etc, and all the other mumbo jumbo to "exploit" this in the > "default configuration." So, the answer to Dan's question > is actually, "no, you can't." Which brings into question the > actual "worth" of mentioning this in the first place. :) > > t > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > [mailto:full-disclosure-<mailto:full-disclosure-> > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of ACROS > > Security Lists > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:42 AM > > To: 'Dan Kaminsky'; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Cc: > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary > Planting Proof > > OfConcept > > > > It would hardly be worth mentioning otherwise. > > > > Cheers, > > Mitja > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > > On > Behalf Of Dan > > > Kaminsky > > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 5:36 PM > > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary Planting > > > Proof OfConcept > > > > > > Does this run code without prompting, on a reasonably default > > > configuration? > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:52 AM, ACROS Security Lists > > > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > We published a remote/local proof of concept for the COM > > > Server-Based > > > > Binary Planting exploit presented at the Hack in the Box > > > conference in Amsterdam. > > > > > > > > Feel free to try it out online if WebDAV works through your > > > firewall, > > > > or download it and test it in your local network or simply > > > on your computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://blog.acrossecurity.com/2011/06/com-server-based-binary-planti > > > ng > > > > -proof.html > > > > or > > > > http://bit.ly/iSxHKO > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Mitja Kolsek > > > > CEO&CTO > > > > > > > > ACROS, d.o.o. > > > > Makedonska ulica 113 > > > > SI - 2000 Maribor, Slovenia > > > > tel: +386 2 3000 280 > > > > fax: +386 2 3000 282 > > > > web: http://www.acrossecurity.com > > > > > > > > ACROS Security: Finding Your Digital Vulnerabilities Before > > > Others Do > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
