lots of misunderstanding... On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:21 AM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > ... some characteristics: > > - full active MitM against CDMA and 4G connections from Rio to carriers.
802.16/ClearWire/Sprint4G did not have LTE to test with. > how to tell if you *MAY HAVE* met the beast at Rio: >.. of course many of these seem innocuous or unrelated. that's the point and why attacking via these methods was effective. there are situations where signal and link would be bad just given congestion and noise floor. however i am speaking to particular effects when the MitM was taking over a connection from target to the carrier and redirecting through itself. this was done in a manner that causes some effects described. sorry media, no inquiries. i bet you can find people to talk to; try reddit and twitter: http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/jeis7/full_disclosure_def_con_19_hackers_get_hacked/ http://twitter.com/?q=defcon+cdma#!/search http://twitter.com/#!/search/defcon%204G _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
