Wow, i am impressed jacqui, you are VERY very aware of the law,moreso than me! I have not seen that yet..well, not so good!@ I am impressed, because I dont really look at taking out the sites otr, people who claim to be pros etc, and, reaally, i should never had began the thread...altho, i saw he is as *popular* guy.. cheers , your work is brilliant. xd
On 4 October 2011 01:57, Jacqui Caren-home <[email protected]>wrote: > On 03/10/2011 16:16, Laurelai wrote: > > that html makes my eyes want to bleed > > The site is obviously commercial, hence getting the below revoked > should be a doddle via a complaint to enom. > > Registrant: > Andrew Wallace > > Registrant type: > UK Individual > > Registrant's address: > The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have > their > address omitted from the WHOIS service. > > The above only applies if you are not advertising, selling or trading in > any manner. > > > UK and EU law regarding commercial web sites is quite well defined but very > rarely enforced > by uk plod etc. Its pretty easy to quote AUP, UK and EU Laws against this > sort of site to > a UK WSP (IIRC google Uk are the WSP). > > I suspect the site will break the Google AUP somehow - given the lack of > business > contact details and the use of hidden address details I suspect google > would > remove the site then ask questions, hence the need to do execute > enom/nominet complaint first :-) > > > Jacqui > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
