I would say, this code would require better, like Creative Commons, perhaps lisencing on 3rd party code, then it can be named exactly what is and isnt added in as a 'paper' to the commons, it is better for his project, i think... GPLv3 , i have not studied but, i am considering the use of 3rd partry modules wich have NO lisencing whatsoever. I will try to help him but, he has to understand, there is simple rules about these things... I think he does though understand, so i will offer my help in this anyhow.. I guess you also have helped, by pointing the lisencing out for him to.. But id debate on wich lisence touse... id take CCommons.. cheers, xd
On 6 October 2011 14:34, root <[email protected]> wrote: > Juan, > > You don't have the faintest idea of how licencing works. You cannot slap > a GPL v3 license to any software you see, much less erase the author's > names. If you find a code in the internet without any license, you > pretty much can't touch it, and must re-implement it completely. > > Software business steal code all the time, but they don't release the > software for everybody to see! > > Next time instead of a few laughs at a list, you may get sued and lose > real money, you fool. > > Please learn how licensing works and just then republish all your code. > > > On 10/05/2011 06:25 PM, Juan Sacco wrote: > > If you want the right to demand certain things from the program, then go > BUY > > a program and do not harass people who are writing software for free, or > go > > and help the developers by writing the functionality yourself. > > > > Juan Sacco > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:32 AM, root <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> - * @author Stefan Zeiger ([email protected]) > >> - print " Written by Blake " > >> - <Information Author="Blake" Date="August 23 2011" Vulnerability="N/A"> > >> > >> +#Exploit Pack - Security Framework for Exploit Developers > >> +#Copyright 2011 Juan Sacco http://exploitpack.com > >> +# > >> +#This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify > >> it under the terms of the > >> +#GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software > >> Foundation, either version 3 > >> +#or any later version. > >> +# > >> +#This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but > >> WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; > >> +#without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > >> PARTICULAR > >> +#PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. > >> +# > >> +#You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > >> along with this program. > >> +#If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Yeeeeeeees why not? > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
