So to qualify for a Darwin Award you need a fatally flawed Intelligent Design.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:48:46 EDT, Jeffrey Walton said: > > > Does the Darwin Awards have a category for dumb computer related > decisions? > > Hmm.. for computer related ones? Good question. > > The Darwin Awards are for those who remove themselves from the gene pool in > *spectacular* ways. They disallow entrants for reasons of mental disease > or > defect-- so failing to reproduce just because you're a troll living in your > parent's basement loses twice - it's commonplace, not spectacular, and > it usually isn't a result of a conscious decision you made. > > Having said that. I suppose it *is* possible. Consider the (hiopefully > hypothetical) example of an expreme overclocker who does something > predictably > stupid and ends up with a lapful of liquid nitrogen and a case of severe > frostbite. Gives a whole new meaing to "shatter attack" ;) > > Yeah, *that* would get a Darwin. ;) > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
