On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <[email protected]> wrote: > About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days > to send a packet, my butt. > There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with > seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only > has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger > vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like > somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... > and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src > so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to > you but thats better way to make it work, this will open > sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal > is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , > iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 > nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with > ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, > and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from what I can make of your writing). No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
