That was SE linux. Sent via BlackBerry® from AIS -----Original Message----- From: char...@funkymunkey.com Sender: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:44:30 To: dave bl<db.pub.m...@gmail.com> Cc: <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
I suppose the real question is, what is more important, that its linux or that its secure by default...? Quoting dave bl <db.pub.m...@gmail.com>: > On 23 November 2011 21:37, <char...@funkymunkey.com> wrote: >> >>> If you can't, maybe you can name other, more secure Linux distro in >>> which your 10 ways do not work. >> >> OpenBSD? :P > > What a great choice for a secure linux distribution ;) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
