On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Markus Hennig <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi all, > > Astaro hereby confirms the described vulnerability. > > In spite of the text below it is not remote exploitable, but needs a valid > administration account to access the web configuration interface called > "WebAdmin". > if it is an XSS attack, then why would the attacker need an account to exploit it? > Within WebAdmin a privilege escalation is the worst case scenario which > can happen. The user with higher privileges has to open a preview window of > a XSS manipulated object. > yeah, if the malicious person can bait a logged in user to visit the prepared url, that would allow the attacker to create an account. > > Because every access and all object modifications are logged with > username and IP and because the issue is not remote exploitable we will fix > it within the regular Up2Date schedule with release of version 8.301. > uhm, I don't see why would a proper logging mitigate the fact that the system is compromised. but it is a good thing that you are fixing it. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
