Hi, You already have a good reputation as a bug-finder. IMHO, releasing additional research in a hurry like this can only tarnish that reputation and feed the trolls. Providing a kernel stack trace ( http://imgur.com/klC4k ) or a more reliable PoC can't take more than an hour, and it will greatly enhance the quality of the report.
If you are worried several people has founded a particular bug and publication is imminent, then maybe was not such a great find to begin with :) On 01/19/2012 02:32 PM, HI-TECH . wrote: > Hi XD, > > Am 19. Januar 2012 15:27 schrieb xD 0x41 <[email protected]>: >> Oh and btw, that coding style, just aint you dude... you know, >> everyone has theyre own fingerprint, i find it really hard to think >> that, you just made this mistakes in cksum area,wich was area wich >> actually does the exploiting :P , so why release crap ? why not make > > I release it because it worked for me INSIDE TWO VM's, I had no clue about the > checksum error. I didnt cripple it. It worked in my tests because I > bet the vmware > did adjust the checksums to be correct. > Why release that crap? Because I wanted to be the first to release an > exploit for it > for fame and glory and it was coded in a hurry, I was thinking it > actually works (I am doing > more tests now on real hardware so I can be sure) > >> it half decent, and as i said, it was not even your coding style so im >> finding this really hard to believe it wwas yours, maybe was modified >> , from many many similars, but, i guess thats normal... you tend to > > It is modified code from other coders as stated in the header. > >> use perl, and bash alot, within your bash, is the .c, and that is your >> style... like zx2c has, like dan rosenberg and JO, all kep the same >> style, because it is habit for any coder.. you dont just change styles >> this fast, or did you get some realllly good ebooks coz, show me where >> you found so i can catch up to it :P) > > I didnt change my coding style, it was just done in a hurry so Dan or > Jon wouldnt beat me on that BWHAHAHA. > >> Love you long time pal, but, find this one abit shitty, and, i do like >> everything in past, your codes going back to you know when, but this >> is bs, and if you were gonna rls it, you shulda fucked with the >> numbers maybe, but, let it fkn run, it was made as poc for lan test >> right, so why cripple it, thats just silly... thats why i attack it, >> and, i dont really care a shit who coded it, but, i doubt it was >> anyone in that code. > > You can attack it its your opinion and thats totally fine. I didnt > cripple the code > actually. > >> have a good day and, no offence over this but, it just shits me when >> people, who know better, go out of theyre way and release publically, >> shit wich is fucked up and, in this case, would waste a persons time, >> and, you even put tested on, and, now, how would it be tested with >> that cksum, please explain that then, your saying you dont have time >> but stop bullshit man, you crippled it, just fkn admit it, it could >> NOT work setup, without the damn cksum, as it was part of sento! how >> could this, be any use, even with the settings back to old, without my >> edit.... you show me one fucking real test, i mean, compile the code, >> infront of people, then go make your fYT vids, seriously, I have told >> Jon Oberheldie this, and others, str8 up, if you release crippled >> shit, your as shit as what you cripple mate. > > You forget about all the codes I rlsed before. As I said this was done > in a hurry. You had a look at roaring beast ? How can you tell me I send > crippled codes out? Buddy I m human too and do mistakes. > >> thats just my point of view and really, this is d0s, wich, i dont care >> for..im saying, you dont see AB release some fucked up exploit every > > AB? whos that ? > >> 2months, and makeSURE it dont work , you dont see anyone release shit >> like this anymore with such blatant errors, its just shitty, luckily i >> nano'd it, yea, i like nano ok, or i would have wasted time > > wtf ? come on.. nano.. this is getting silly > >> kcope...its just that simple, and no offences atall, i was able to >> spot this, but, do not sit there, telling me and everyone else, that >> it was working, tested... coz, we both know that was NOT the same code >> released, you cannot deny the code.... simple. >> you screwed this one up. go back to exploiting :P itsd better and your >> better at it! :P > > As I said I tested it with two VMS in a testbed and both Ubuntu and > OpenSUSE crashed > instantly. > >> I like your shit, but, i realllllly prefer, when kxcope, is thinking >> of b0f and new methods etc, like i know the one from 2009 did, and >> found the biggest remote hole ever,and you even released this , and >> people can hate you and whatever but there is no denying it, your damn >> skilled, so im just saying, i dont like crippled work, nowdays, and >> when it is released with a mark of approval, from someone i trust. > > Its 2011 and I found a bug in FreeBSD ftpd. Which is better than ProFTPD coz > it rocks, have you ever seen a bug in FreeBSD ftpd since ~10 years ? > >> this is private, and, stays here but, this is why i attacked you dude, >> and, nothing bad about it, it stays here, and, thats it... i wont say >> shit, i have said what i wanted, your a nice guy, i like you, so, >> thats all, i just dont want to see you ending up like them other fags, >> they have 0 respect UG... you do atleast have that... fuck fd lists >> respect... but still, you just had to leave out that line 'tested' ;) > > I like the public scene more than the dark one. > >> ok, sorry for any confusion etc but, thats all i think and, i want you >> to know exactly what i think, and know i am not being mean atall... >> and apologise for even puttingthat retort onto fd..i should have just > OMG how the ***** you have time to write me so long lines ? > >> pmd you, but i loose sight of your nickname sometimes...anyhow... i >> hope your not offended but, i did not try to offend you atall, i just >> found it really weird that yopu released that and, it was shitty >> lol... lan d0s :P i mean, we could have lan PARTY now, we could all >> get drunk and crunk but, not lan-d0s :P > > HEHE, I want to see the CCC Hackerspace got hit by that. > >> hehe, tcare man, i fucking find you one of my inspirations and why i >> get up everyday, is to greet the people, who have some repspect in >> them, i will makesure also the post goes only for regged members or >> sumthin also, just to make it abit harder i guess for ppl to look >> at...fkit.. i should not have even bothered saying shit but, i love >> packets :P > > I have respect of you too. But next time please dont rls my FreeBSD locals > on pastebin. > >> i just do, and, i added the other codes, so anyone could modify the >> other codes, or port it to windows... and, nothing more... it is only >> a frag adding app, and shows basic socket use... nothing more... so, >> it was basically, an adon, to your tool, it would be nice to do a test >> with fragging.. anyhow, i might do that myself...see howfar this bug >> can be pushed... take care man, i hope your cool , take it easy and >> speak to you soon >> drew > > Ok good, so your code works actually? Over the internet ............ > This is an exercise for the interested reader. > > Regards, > > Kingcope > >> >> On 20 January 2012 00:28, HI-TECH . >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello xD, >>> sorry I don't understand a word you are talking about. >>> To put everything together about what you were ranting would take too >>> much time for me. >>> Did I offend you in any way ? >>> It's just a PoC for people to test their systems nothing else... >>> I cannot check each every system if it works, I just checked two boxes >>> and thats enough for me. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kc >>> >>> Am 19. Januar 2012 04:56 schrieb xD 0x41 <[email protected]>: >>>> Now, heres the one wich works, without in_chksum bug ;) >>>> >>>> http://pastebin.com/x1ShKAUT >>>> >>>> now, sorry but, had to try it remotely, sheesh, and, you dont >>>> cripple, code of old bugs and, half of this code is from an old bug >>>> anyhow, so why the heck not leave it... i guess now your starting to >>>> look like Jon Oberheldie the king of fucked up cripples... lol... >>>> ewnjoy folks. this version, may even work! omg isnt this amazing!! >>>> XD says to FD a BIG FUCKS YOU ,well cept kcope and few other decent >>>> guys like me :P ,and nme, and tropic and well, #Haxnet :) >>>> now go fucking shoot yourselves away with your newbie working >>>> undeadattack.. dont know why someone did not inform me they would >>>> cripple it, and maybe forward a copy to me but, now this file, goes >>>> where the rest go, to the shame files... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 January 2012 08:11, HI-TECH . >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Demonstration of the Exploit: >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78nAxh70yZE (thanks ClsHack) >>>>> >>>>> see attached content >>>>> >>>>> /Kingcope >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
