'Clear purpose for committing any of the offenses' is usually easy to prove.
-Travis On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:43:16 +0200, psy said: > > this is the official text. > > > > > http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-476.089+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN > > Thanks for posting that. Looks like the final text is in fact not that > bad. In > particular, Amendent 7 clarifies that authorized pen-testing is legal, and > Amendment 22 strikes the "possession" of tools/devices and adds "for the > clear > purpose of committing any of the offences". > > So you're allowed to have a copy of Metasploit, but pointing it someplace > you don't have permission is still strictly forbidden. Sanity wins, at > least this > time. ;) > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn>| GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com<http://www.travisbiehn.com>
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
