On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Gary E. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Maybe, but my real world example shows your simplistic logic is wrong. > Is say who? > > Psych 101: Evil people have no shame. > And is you say my logic is wrong. You: "If you become a whistleblower, you are evil for disclosing the danger. How dare you post information on a vulnerability before allowing the vendor to fix the issue. Lives are at stake, people are in real danger!" Is vendor have their act together, is problem never leave prior to "test use cases" in Dev and Q&A. Where is responsibility of vendor lie? Vendor is solely care to make money not is churn out fixes. So according to is your logic: MusntLive discover pedo, report pedo, authorities lallygag, MusntLive publicize pedo info, MusntLive is evil. MusntLive discover is Lockheed has glitch on plane cause pilot to crash, MusntLive publish information so to for pilots can know, MusntLive is evil for exposure. MusntLive discover is flaw in mechanism that shut down power grid, rush to warn people via full disclosure, MusntLive is evil. Nice logic is there in your thinking. Perhaps maybe to if you are in Poland. Is I discover flaw, what is make you think no one else is has discover flaw. According to your is logic: "sit around and wait for the responsible vendor to fix it. In the meantime worry little about the dozens of other attackers that likely know about the flaw and are actively exploiting it!" Nice logic Gary. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
