they should not have been fixed, as when exploit has been released they where not and looking at SVN no change has been made ( http://pligg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pligg/ ) no CVE has been asked for this vuln (at least from me), so none should has been assigned. And regarding your post been deleted: it's a common practice for the head of Pligg to try hiding bugs of his CMS instead of encouraging responsible disclosing them ( that's why exploit has been released in the wild ).
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Henri Salo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 06:34:46PM +0200, BlackHawk wrote: > > Exploit attached, info inside. 2.0 versions could still be affected > > > > http://pastebin.com/MSXFSvzA > > Do you know if these issues have been fixed in some version of Pligg and > if these have CVE-identifiers? I tried to ask this from forum.pligg.com, > but my post was removed. > > - Henri Salo > -- BlackHawk - [email protected] Remembered not as a messenger, remembered not as a reformer, not as a prophet, not as a hero, not even as Sebastian. Remembered only…as Jack.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
