In fact, it's not a vulnerability in malware. It's a vulnerability in a tool used to control computers infected by malicious software. But I can't see that being relevant at all.
2012/10/11 <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:25:50 +0200, Pascal Ernster said: > > > I suppose it turns into a 0 day when you post it on this mailing list > > and happen to be in the mood to put the vendor's marketing division on > > BCC. > > > > -1 day could be when you ask a friend to check your mail to this ML for > > major grammar errors before you post it. > > All this ranting about the meaning of a 0-day - and not one person has > mentioned the fact that the vulnerability is in *malware*??!? > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
